• Author

  • Twitter

    Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

  • Flickr

  • Calendar

    September 2008
    M T W T F S S
  • Progressive Bloggers

Sir Charles on the Issues

I really don’t mean to write about politics all the time, but any time Charles Barkley is interviewed on the subject, I have to pass it on.

Open Source Strategizing

This may be a window into the future of political campaigns.

While it isn’t an official Obama for America initiative, I nonetheless received notice of it through my facebook support of the campaign.

No Reason for an Election Yet

Despite the insistence of our prime minister that parliament can no longer function, the Governor General should refuse to dissolve parliament until such time that this is proven.

Parliament has managed to function for 2 1/2 years. Budgets and legislation have been passed, and leaving the inability to get Conservatives in front of a committee aside, things have gone pretty smoothly. That the Prime Minister no longer wants to work with this parliament, and prefers instead an election, is not reason enough to send Canadians to the polls.

Here is what should happen:

Let’s say that Prime Minister Harper visits the Governor General tomorrow (Tuesday, September 2) and asks her to dissolve parliament, which she would have the authority to do according to the Canada Elections Act, notwithstanding the generally fixed dates of our elections according to law.

The Governor General should ask for evidence that parliament will not function. Should none be produced, she should ask the leaders of the opposition parties if they are willing to make parliament work in some form or other until October 2009.

If their response is anything but an absolutely firm “no way, no how, no parliament”, she should present our prime minister with two options:

1. Continuing to govern until October 2009 or the government loses the confidence of the house on a vote, whichever comes first.
2. If he is absolutely convinced he can no longer govern in this parliament, he should resign.

In situation 1, I assume Harper will try to engineer his own defeat, without looking like he’s doing so, as soon as possible.

In situation 2, the Governor General should ask the leader of the official opposition, Stephane Dion, if he wishes to attempt to govern. It would also be reasonable to me, given that Dion’s party holds less than 1/3 of the seats in the house, to give him a deadline, say next Monday or Tuesday, by which he must demonstrate evidence that there is at least a good chance he can govern until next fall.

This would likely involve some sort of agreement with the NDP and/or the Bloc. No two of those three parties can combine for a majority of parliament. Nonetheless, even a Liberal-NDP coalition (formal or not) would be roughly equal to the size of the Conservative caucus. It should be given the chance to pass legislation and a budget, either with the Bloc supporting it or agreeing to abstain in some form to allow its passage.

Fixed election dates, an initiative I support, were meant to help level the playing field between the different parties. No longer could sitting governments call for an election when the polls and the timing suited them best. I can understand the need to go to the polls before the four year mandate is up if the parliament, as currently configured, just couldn’t pass legislation. That hasn’t been proven to be the case so far, and I see no reason why it would be the case going forward.

Until we have evidence that this parliament cannot function, I see no reason for an election. I hope our Governor General feels the same way.